Follow Us
en English
FREE Consultation |
en English
FREE Consultation | Se Habla Español
Houston Injury Lawyers

Video Center​

Damages in Houston Personal Injury lawsuits in Houston Texas

1. Damage is an essential element of the plaintiff’s prima facie case for negligence. This means actual harm or injury. Unlike the situation for some of the intentional torts, the damage will not be presumed. Thus, nominal damages are not available in action in negligence; some proof of harm must be offered.

Click HERE if you have a Claim in Sugar Land for Personal Injury

Call Houston Injury Lawyers at 713 366 HURT

a. Personal Injury Plaintiff is to be compensated for all his damages (past, present, and prospective), both special and general. This includes fair and adequate compensation for economic damages, such as medical expenses and lost earnings, and noneconomic damages, such as pain and suffering. Plaintiff is also entitled to compensation for impaired future earning capacity, discounted to present value to avoid an excess award; i. e. The plaintiff receives an amount that, if securely invested, would produce the income the jury wishes him to have.

b. Property Damage, The measure of damages for property damage is the reasonable repair cost or if the property has been almost or wholly destroyed, its fair market value at the time of the accident. Courts generally do not permit recovery of emotional distress damages for negligent harm to property.

c. Punitive Damages Punitive damages generally are not available in negligence cases. However, if the defendant’s conduct was “wanton and willful,” reckless, or malicious, most jurisdictions permit recovery of punitive damages.

d. Nonrecoverable Items: Certain items are not recoverable as damages in negligence actions. These include 1) Interest from the date of damage in personal injury action and 2) Attorneys’ fees.

Click here to contact us now

2. Duty to Mitigate Damages: In all cases, the plaintiff must take reasonable steps to mitigate damages in property damage cases to preserve and safeguard the property, and in personal injury cases, to seek appropriate treatment to effect a cure or healing and to prevent aggravation. Failure to mitigate precludes recovery of any additional damages caused by the aggravation of the injury.

Mitigation of damages is a contract law concept requiring a victim in a contract dispute to minimize the damages resulting from a breach of the contract. In other terms, it means that the victim is legally obligated to act in a manner that will mitigate both the effects of the breach and their losses, and even if the victim who suffers emotional injury through no fault of their own should take reasonable steps to avoid further loss, and to minimize the consequences of the injury. As such, the mitigation of damages law is outlined in the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code – Section §147.123 which provides:

(a) In an action to which Chapter 33 (Proportionate Responsibility) applies, the Court shall instruct the finder of fact regarding the determination of responsibility according to Section §33.003 (Determination of Percentage of Responsibility) using the appropriate approved pattern jury charge which the Court may modify as appropriate to the circumstances.

(b) In all actions not governed by Subsection (a), the Court shall instruct the finder of fact regarding a claimant’s duty to mitigate or avoid damages in a manner appropriate to the action using the appropriate approved pattern jury charge, which the Court may modify as appropriate to the circumstances.
In other words, the Code allows the finder of facts the jury to decide whether a person took the necessary steps to avoid increasing damages or “mitigate” their damages. Under Texas law, whether a person took the steps required to avoid increasing damages or “mitigate” their injuries would be grounds for recovery. And denial of recovery.

Click HERE if you have a Claim in Spring Texas for Personal Injury

701 N Post Oak Rd #207
Houston, TX 77024

The Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, in Fort Worth stated in Cotton that “The mitigation of damages doctrine requires the injured party to exercise reasonable care to minimize its damages if damages can be avoided with the only slight expense and reasonable effort. The party asserting failure to mitigate has the burden of proving facts showing a lack of mitigation. It must also show the amount by which the damages were increased by failure to mitigate.” Cotten v. Weatherford Bancshares, Inc., 187 S.W.3d 687, 708 (Tex. App. 2006). Further, the Court held in Cotton that the party asserting affirmative defense must request findings in support thereof to avoid waiver.

If you have any questions about Personal Injury Claims or Mitigation, call Houston Injury Lawyers, PLLC, our firm focuses the entirety of our time and expertise on representing those who have suffered a The lawyers at Houston Injury Lawyers, PLLC, can help you navigate this issue and answer any questions that you may have. If you would like to speak to someone about your particular situation or for a free and confidential consultation, call our office at (713) 366-HURT (4878) today or visit us online at

3. Collateral Source Rule As a general rule, damages are not reduced or mitigated because of benefits received by the plaintiff from other sources, e. g., health insurance and sick pay from the employer. Hence, at trial, defendants may not introduce evidence relating to any such financial aid from other sources. A growing number of states have made exceptions to this rule in certain types of actions (e. g., medical malpractice actions), allowing defendants to introduce evidence of insurance awards or disability benefits.

Share Via
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin